![]() |
|
Copyright 2002-2009 CHEC.
All Rights Reserved. |
<<Back Eileen Fox Mullica Hill, New Jersey
In January 1995 during the application of a new, rubberized, gymnasium floor, our children again experienced symptoms, this time of a more serious nature. This type of gym floor is a poured liquid and included the use of chemicals such as methyl isobutyl ketone, toluene, xylene, lead chromate, titanium dioxide, methylenebis, ethyl benzene, and acetates. The use of these chemicals in a school environment when children are present is a serious health hazard, as the lungs and skin easily absorb them. The first application of the gym floor did not adhere properly and required sanding to prepare the surface for a second application. The sanding released dust particles (that contained lead chromate and other chemicals) throughout the school. After the sanding and second floor application, our children were frequently out of school due to illness as a result of the exposure to these hazardous chemicals. Although both teachers and children had reactions due to chemical exposure, parents were never notified of any chemical hazard in the school. Kimberley experienced an increasing number of headaches and stomachaches, vomiting, lethargy, and congestion. Cherie became extremely ill with an inflamed pancreas and lost 5 pounds in three weeks. Due to the effect of the exposure on Cherie¹s pancreas, she still requires four to six small meals a day to maintain her weight. Both children experienced broken bones. Xylene and toluene, chemicals used in the application of the gym floor, attack the bone marrow, making the skeleton more vulnerable to injury. In addition, they both experienced bronchiole asthma, which required the use of an inhaler. They both still suffer from unexplained headaches and stomachaches. The diagnoses of both children was traced to their exposure to chemicals used in the gym floor renovation. We contacted every agency in the state of New Jersey for assistance. We were informed that there were no laws prohibiting the use of chemicals in schools while children are present and that their parents do not have to be notified. There was not a single reporting agency where parents could file a formal written complaint. In addition, we found that there are no standards for children¹s exposure to chemicals as data is based on the body weight of an average adult male. In January 1998, after writing numerous letters
to our state legislators, the New Jersey Parent/Student Right to Know
Law (Senate Bill No. 246), was passed and signed by Governor Christine
Whitman. This law prohibits the use or storage of certain hazardous chemicals,
except in emergency situations, in schools and child care centers when
children are present. Parents must be notified each year of this law and
their "right to know" the names of chemicals being used in community
chools. We are now working on a Federal law to include all schools in
the U.S. Eileen Fox testified before the NJ State Senate
and Assembly Committees concerning the use of chemicals in schools. She
was a keynote speaker at the 1998 Washington D.C. conference, Tools for
Schools, and was awarded the 1998 NJ Environmental Federation Achievement
Commendation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||